I am inspired today to share a presentation I gave in 2019 at the American Academy of Religion in San Diego on a topic that becomes more salient by the day. As Russia invades Ukraine, I am thoughtful that we need guidance from the spiritual authorities of our age. Russia is practicing what Meher Baba called “selfish violence,” “[w]hen violence is done for selfish motives by an individual or nation for power and selfish gains, etc.” It cries out for what he called “selfless violence,” or “[v]iolence done in self-defense when one is attacked treacherously, and with no other selfish motive” and even “nonviolent violence,” which is “[v]iolence done solely to defend the weak where there is no question of self-defense or self-motivation.” Read on to learn more.
Stick to Truth at all costs, even if it means giving up your political life. Do not try to force nonviolence on unwilling adherents, nor even try to establish it, since it is already eternally established.
––Meher Baba[1]
I. Introduction
This challenging message to Gandhi that Meher Baba gave in 1941 encapsulates the main issues that these two men often discussed. We might frame these issues with the following question: how does one’s notion of universal Truth relate to strategies of violence and nonviolence to influence our shared life in the world? In this presentation, I will first describe the development of Gandhi’s and Meher Baba’s friendship, and then because of time, I will only very briefly highlight Meher Baba’s view of violence and nonviolence in the context of his broad understanding of the growth of consciousness in creation, what he called “The Divine Theme.” What is salient for the purposes of this presentation is that Meher Baba claimed to have worked through Gandhi to accomplish his spiritual goals for India and the world. He also shared his views of violence and non-violence as well as important parts of “The Divine Theme” with Gandhi, warning him also that his satyagraha work and his uncompromising attempts to force and establish nonviolence in the world would cause suffering now and in the future for many people and for Gandhi personally. Even still, Meher Baba encouraged Gandhi and held him in very high esteem. Baba told his mandali (close disciples),
“Gandhi will suffer terribly in the next life for his present political activities and social movements … as all these activities have caused so many people to suffer. The sanskaras [impressions] of those who follow him now, and who suffer doing so, will be the cause of Gandhi’s suffering in his next birth. But Gandhi is doing all this with the best of intentions and therefore will realize God in his third life after this” (LM 1927: 836).
Gandhi could not accept Baba’s perspectives about violence and nonviolence. Gandhi equated Truth with nonviolence as a moral absolute in political life, while Meher Baba equated Truth with nonviolence as a universal spiritual principle of Love that included and even required violence as part of its manifestation in some phases of growth in all human lives.
I present this material as an insider. I am a member of an American spiritual school called Sufism Reoriented that Meher Baba founded in 1952. Some of the material that I will present today is culled from a hagiography entitled Lord Meher written by a mandali member (disciple) of Meher Baba named Bhau Kalchuri (1927-2013).[2] I gathered about 200 double-spaced pages on a Word document from this source that pertains to Meher Baba’s relationship with Gandhi, which signals just how important this friendship is to an understanding of Meher Baba’s life and work.
For those who may not know of Meher Baba, I offer a very brief introduction. His original name was Merwan Sheriar Irani, born in Poona, India in 1894 to Irani Zoroastrian immigrants. In his twenties he became what he called a God-realized spiritual master owing to his contact with other “Perfect Masters” who realized him: Narayan Maharaj of Kedgaon, Sai Baba of Shirdi, Tajuddin Baba of Nagpur, and especially Hazrat Babajan of Poona and Upasni Maharaj of Sakori. In fact, Meher Baba’s first contact with Gandhi is related to Upasni Maharaj. In 1924 Meher Baba sent Gandhi his Gujarati hagiography of Upasni Maharaj entitled Sakorina Sadguru or The Sadguru of Sakori (Recent updated volume here). By the force of this book, Gandhi visited the Master of Sakori. Gandhi said to Baba, “When I went to him, he had only a sackcloth wrapped around his waist. Seeing me, he parted it, revealing himself, and said, referring to me, ‘However great or renowned in the world he may be, what have I to do with him?’” (LM 1955: 3864). Bhau Kalchuri commented about this episode writing that “Gandhi’s connection was with Meher Baba, not Maharaj, and that is why Maharaj scolded him and drove him away” (LM 1931:1241). For another time, I do wonder if Upasni exposed himself to mirror Gandhi’s well-known struggle with lust and celibacy. Upasni once said that whatever people thought of him, it was really themselves that they saw. He said the following, which Gandhi would have read in the original Gujarati biography:
“My cup is completely empty. Whatever I tell you is simply your own knowledge. It resonates in me, and I repeat it back to you so that you can understand it more easily. And any knowledge that comes to me from you does not stay within me for long. In the same way whatever goodness you see in me, this too comes from you. I simply reflect it back to you in a purified form. And whatever ugliness and baseness you see in me is a reflection of your own qualities. This is why you may find me at one moment pleasantly discussing spirituality, then the next moment shouting and cursing with the foulest possible language. My being simply mirrors yours. I present before you the full range of your states of mind. All your thoughts and feelings are on display, but they are entirely yours. I am nothing but a blank screen, a big zero, an utterly empty void.” (Upasni Maharaj 2020: 263).
Back to Merwan. Merwan’s early followers gave him the name “Meher Baba,” meaning “Compassionate Father.” He is known for his silence that he practiced for forty-four years. In 1932 he claimed that his mission was simply to “make others realize the Truth in every phase of life and to make brotherhood a practical fact” (LM 1932:1415). Meher Baba’s is a path of realizing the Truth in every phase of life through love. He said, “To love the world and serve it in the ways of the Masters is no game for the weak and faint-hearted” (Meher Baba 2007c: 120-21). He often cautioned people that “It is no joke to love. If you have come to see this as fun, you will become fun yourself!” (LM: 4873). Later in 1958, in what is known as his “Universal Message” he said that “I have come not to teach but to awaken” (LM 1958: 4447). Near Hamirpur, Uttar Pradesh, on February 10, 1954, Meher Baba’s birthday on the Parsi calendar, he announced publicly that he was God in human form, the Avatar, or living Christ come again.
Meher Baba traveled all over the world, gathering a devoted following in India, Europe and the UK, the US, and Australia. He did spiritual work with children, adults of all classes and religions or worldviews. He also worked with animals and the natural world, with technology and culture, and with advanced spiritual figures in both the East and the West. He shed his blood in two serious automobile accidents in America and India, where he broke many of the bones on the left and right side of his body, respectively. After years of chronic pain, he died in his Meherazad ashram in 1969 a few months after proclaiming that he had completed his universal spiritual work “100 percent to my satisfaction” (LM 1968: 5340). This universal work was to transform basic matter to create what he called a “New Humanity” that “will attain to a new mode of being and life through the free and unhampered interplay of pure love from heart to heart” (Meher Baba 2007a: 12). He claimed that the result of this transformation is a new age of joy that would host a “new world culture” that “will not deny the value of diverse traditions, nor will it merely accord them patronizing tolerance. On the contrary, it will entail active appreciation of the diverse religions and cultures” (Meher Baba 1985: 143). He also said (and this is germane to our topic today) that this new age of joy would not occur without significant opposition and even violence before it proved itself worthy of being.
II. Story of a Friendship
In reading the material of Lord Meher, I was struck by how much Meher Baba loved Gandhi even as he criticized him. Knowing Meher Baba’s method of working with others, we might even say that Baba loved Gandhi in criticizing him. Meher Baba thought Gandhi’s shortcomings were his desire “to keep every party pleased,” his need to “preach such things which he himself can’t or won’t do,” and “vanity and inconsistency” (LM 1931: 1256). Baba more often praised the Mahatma saying things like “Gandhiji was a jewel of a soul,” “Gandhi’s heart was incomparable; it was pure gold,” and “No one’s heart was as beautiful as his.” (LM 1954:3498, 1955:3780, 1955:3865). His highest compliment is the following, (which was alluded to before): “Gandhi is the best man amongst the present-day political workers and public servants. He is quite sincere. He has no thought of any deception and is not mean-spirited in any of his actions. He has a fine mentality. He will realize God in his third life after this one, after 170 years.” (1927:780).
Meher Baba called Gandhi, “Dosaji,” a term of affection for an old man, since he was Baba’s senior by twenty-five years. Gandhi called Meher Baba “Babaji” and they built a friendship from 1924-48. They kept in touch mainly through letters and proxies, though they met face to face three times. The first time was in 1931 onboard the steamer Rajputanawhen Gandhi traveled to London for the Round Table Talks while Baba traveled to gather his first Western disciples in England. Gandhi came to Baba’s cabin three times on the ship. They met in London as well that same month, and lastly, they met for about an hour in 1932 at Gandhi’s residence right before Gandhi was arrested in put in prison.
In these meetings, they discussed spiritual matters, nonviolence, and their mutual love for the Untouchable class and their desire to bring them into the mainstream. Baba, in fact, met with the leader of the Untouchables, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar in 1932 upon Gandhi’s request to persuade him to work with Gandhi to seek joint electorates for the Untouchables with the rest of Hindu society. Baba and Gandhi also spoke about working for Hindu-Muslim unity, yet for practical purposes, Baba advised that they have separate electorates. They discussed India’s future beyond British rule, and the role of the West, especially that of America, whose materialism actually made Baba quite proud to the consternation of Gandhi, one would imagine. Meher Baba told him, “In America, the spiritual hunger is intense. … There is everything there materially. There is wealth; there are brains; there is heart. In other words, there is sufficient preparedness for spiritual growth and development” (LM 1931:1345).
Gandhi also promised in their first meetings that if India gained independence, he would come to live with Meher Baba. Meher Baba never forgot this promise and consistently tried to stay in contact with him to bring him into his circle. In 1953, reminiscing a few years after Gandhi’s assassination, Baba said to his lovers, “There is only one man who led a life of 100 percent truthfulness and honesty, and that was Mahatma Gandhi. I took a promise from him when he met me on the steamer Rajputana that he should come to me after India attains independence. He kept his promise, and he has come to me.” (LM 1953:3261).
This might tempt one to wonder if Gandhi ever thought of Baba as his guru in the same way as Baba thought of Gandhi as part of him and his work. In 1932 Gandhi wrote in a letter that “the relationship between Baba and me is not that of guru and disciple, but is that of two ordinary friends.” Baba took this a bit further, emphasizing their extraordinaryfriendship. He responded directly to Gandhi saying that “I take you as Premi Mitra, one who is my loving friend; because in each one, I see no other than myself. Thus, whose ‘Guru’ can I be and where can the ‘chela’ [disciple] be! According to me, of all friends, he alone is dearest who remains infinitely restless for Truth!” (LM 1932:1482-1495). Gandhi was such a soul “restless for Truth,” of course, in Meher Baba’s view, and why I think he loved him so much.
Gandhi loved Baba as well but was puzzled by him. According to Lord Meher, Gandhi told Baba on the Rajputanathat “I feel within that you are someone great” and because of this greatness Gandhi was anxious that Meher Baba break his silence and teach by means of words in books or speech as he was doing. At that time, Meher Baba shared a part of a special book that he wrote about the theme of creation and its purpose. This was an unprecedented thing because he had never shown it to anyone else, even his mandali, and has since become lost. Gandhi read the part that he was given and was impressed by the ideas but more by the authority behind them. Meher Baba told him that he would speak soon and share his “Word.” Many years later, however, Baba was still practicing silence and he commented through hand gestures that “still the promise is not kept. Why? Because eternally it has been my habit to give promises and break them, because I am eternally free from all bindings. I told this to Gandhi, too. He laughed.” (LM 1955:3780).
III. Violence and Non-Violence in Meher Baba’s Divine Theme
In 1942, as World War II raged, Baba dictated on his alphabet board four messages that covered topics like violence and non-violence, the war, and India. He gave copies of these messages to over thirty leaders of the All India Congress before their ill-fated meeting with Stafford Cripps to enlist India to fight in exchange for independence. Gandhi called the ideas in Meher Baba’s messages “wholly inapplicable” (LM 1942: 2273). Within one of the messages, Meher Baba said that
A right understanding of the status of violence and non-violence in the scheme of spiritual values requires true perception of the meaning of the purpose of existence. Action, therefore, should not be governed by means of any slogans (however high sounding) based upon incomplete and insufficient ideas of mere violence or mere non-violence. It should be a spontaneous outcome of divine love, which is above duality, and of spiritual understanding, which is above rules. (Meher Baba 2007a: 104-5).
Based on his understanding “of the meaning of the purpose of existence” rooted in divine love, Meher Baba than gave a typology that lists different levels of violence and non-violence that are practiced in a developmental way by all human beings. I will briefly show you these levels and focus on where Gandhi might fit.
The list moves along a path from what Baba called “Non-Love,” which is “Violence,” to the goal of “Love,” which is “Non-Violence.”
Baba listed four classes of Violence (Non-Love):
1. Selfish Violence based on hatred and lust (Baba comments that this is “When violence is done for selfish motives by an individual or nation for power and selfish gains, etc.”).
2. Non-Violence of the Coward based on limited weakness of character and mind (Baba explains that “Those who do not resist aggression because of fear and for no other reason belong to this class”).
3. Selfless Violence based on limited human love (Baba writes that this is “Violence done in self-defense when one is attacked treacherously, and with no other selfish motive”).
4. Non-Violent Violence based on unlimited love (This is “Violence done solely to defend the weak where there is no question of self-defense or self-motivation”).
Baba then listed two classes of Non-Violence (Love):
5. Non-Violence of the Brave based on unlimited pure love (He comments, “This applies to those who, although not one with all through actual realization, consider no one as their enemy. They try to win over the aggressors through Love and give up their lives by being attacked, not through fear but through Love”).
6. Non-Violence Pure and Simple based on divine love (This is the goal of creation and Baba comments that “Here one sees all as his own Self and beyond both friendship and enmity. Never under any circumstances does a single thought of violence enter his mind”) (Meher Baba 2007a: 106-107).
It is safe to suggest that Gandhi practiced beautifully “Non-Violence of the Brave based on unlimited pure love.” He tried to win over aggressors to Love, sacrificing his body in fasting, in beatings, and in many other ways. He literally gave up his life by being attacked not through fear but through Love, chanting the sweet name of God on his lips as he breathed his last. Such a practice is rare since it demonstrates the consciousness of someone on the threshold of the goal of life, which Baba claimed Gandhi indeed was stationed, given that he said he had only three more lives to live until it would be achieved.
Baba commented that though “Non-Violence of the Brave” is to be aspired to because it is the preparation for the real goal of life––“Non-Violence Pure and Simple,” it cannot be forced upon the masses who do not yet possess the requisite maturity to hold such an experience and consciousness. To make them attempt such a way of life before they are ready, would risk them falling into what Meher Baba calls “Non-Violence of the Coward,” that is, the masses will end up resisting “aggression simply because of fear,” weakening their sense of self. Therefore, he advocated that one should lead the masses to “Non-Violence of the Brave” by first encouraging them to master “Non-Violent Violence” (or violence done on behalf of another with no thought of self); and if this is not yet possible, to encourage people to try “Selfless Violence” (or violence done in self-defense) (Meher Baba 2007a: 108-9). The goal, he repeats, is “Non-Violence, Pure and Simple,” but one achieves it through stages of mastery. He warns, “The means must not be confused with or otherwise mixed up with the goal itself” (Meher Baba 2007a: 110).
Julius Lipner notes that along with sacred scriptures, Gandhi relied on a specific understanding of human nature for his ideology of nonviolence, which I think accounts for the main difference between he and Meher Baba’s view of non-violence. Lipner writes, “For him [Gandhi], nonviolence was politically apt precisely because it was a moral absolute. And it was a moral absolute because it was rooted in human nature” as he understood it. Lipner continues that nonviolence for Gandhi, “is an expression of the human condition. It is how human beings can be true to themselves: Nonviolence is the law of our species as violence is the law of the brute.”[3]
For Meher Baba, the human being is equal to evolution; that is, all forms in creation are contained within the human form, and as such, the human being experiences––in self-aware ways and at different stages of development in reincarnation––the consciousness of all other creatures. Contrary to Gandhi, for Baba the law of the human species is the law of the brute made conscious. We have within us, the drive to rip each other apart just as the lion seeks to tear apart the deer. At the same time, we have within us the aspiration to turn to the light as the rose seeks the sun. In Meher Baba’s teaching called “The Divine Theme,” which is described in his book God Speaks and The Nothing and the Everything, he explains the way in which consciousness grows along this path of evolution to the human form and from the human to the divine (See the two charts “Divine Theme” in God Speaks pp. 224, 226). This journey is, in his view, a long progressive process of growth of each soul from duality to union, from violence and conflict to harmony and love (or non-violence).
As a conclusion, I want to highlight this Divine Theme depicted in art and its relationship to Meher Baba’s view of violence and non-violence. I will also try to situate Gandhi within this cosmology. I apologize but this has to be a rather fast tour of murals of The Divine Theme that are installed within our Sufi Sanctuary in Walnut Creek, CA and in the Meher Baba Universal Spiritual Centre in Byramangala, India, south of Bangalore. These murals depict the different states of God as he develops consciousness of Himself in a progressive fashion from what Baba calls “evolution,” “reincarnation,” “involution,” and then “realization of Himself.”
Meher Baba says that each soul experiences 50,400,000 forms in evolution until it is ready to be human. There is no going backwards (Nothing and the Everything 291). God in the state of human reincarnation occurs next when consciousness is fully achieved but not able to know that its true nature is God owing to the sanskaras or impressions that evolution wound around it, veiling it from the light of its own Self-knowledge. The sanskaras are depicted by the gilded and colored ribbons and loops in each mural. After what Meher Baba says are 8,400,000 lives in reincarnation that shake loose sanskaras as a human being, a “Turning Point” follows in which each soul tires of the dual nature of human experience and starts to question the meaning of life and to seek something more (God Speaks 155; Nothing and the Everything 291). The soul enters the next stage of growth as God in the different states of what Meher Baba called “Involution” when sanskarasare unwound, gradually unveiling the light of one’s own Self-Consciousness. This is the spiritual path of return to God in his Infinite Conscious state, which Baba said takes 1,400,000 years (not lives) to achieve for each soul (Nothing and the Everything 134-5).
Where would Gandhi fit within this scheme? Julius Lipner wrote that “Gandhi once said that Truth is God (not God is Truth). In this respect, what he wanted by the life he lived, was to see ‘God’ face to face, in utter transparency.”[4]Relatedly, Meher Baba said that Gandhi had three more lives to live before he became God realized. He would, therefore, be stationed on the sixth plane of consciousness in Meher Baba’s system, which Baba called the plane of full illumination where one in fact sees God face to face and is overcome with a desire to eventually becomes what one sees.
As a Baba-lover, I see this friendship between Gandhi and Meher Baba as a tribute to them both: I would call it the Truth of Non-Violence of the Brave in friendship with the Truth of Non-Violence Pure and Simple.
Bibliography
Baba, Meher. 1985. Listen, Humanity. Atlanta and Denver: In Company With Meher Baba.
____. 1997. God Speaks. Walnut Creek, CA: Sufism Reoriented.
____. 2007a. Discourses I. Myrtle Beach, SC: Sheriar Foundation.
____. 2007b. Discourses II. Myrtle Beach, SC: Sheriar Foundation.
___. 2007c. Discourses III. Myrtle Beach, SC: Sheriar Foundation.
Coward, Harold, ed. 2003. Indian Critiques of Gandhi. New York: SUNY Press.
Irani, Beheram Jamshed and Desai, Sorabji Muncherji. 2020. Upasni Maharaj: A Perfect Master of India. Trans. Anurag Gumastha. Ed. Murshida Carol Weyland Conner, Gabrielle Cavagnaro, Eleanore Lambert, and Henry Mindlin. Walnut Creek, CA: Sufism Reoriented.
Kalchuri, Bhau. 1981. The Nothing and the Everything. Myrtle Beach, SC: Manifestation Inc.
____. Meher Prabhu: Lord Meher, The Biography of the Avatar of the Age, Meher Baba. Online edition http://www.lordmeher.org/rev/index.jsp; Last updated 9.20.19.
[1] Bhau Kalchuri, Lord Meher (hereafter LM)1941:2243. I am listing the year in which the quotation was made and then page number in these notes.
[2] The full title of this text is Meher Prabhu: Lord Meher, The Biography of the Avatar of the Age, Meher Baba. It was first published in Hindi, Bhau’s first language, and then in English as a 20-volume series of over 6500 pages in the 1980s. I am using the online edition, http://www.lordmeher.org, last updated 9.20.19. Hereafter LM.
[3] Julius Lipner in Indian Critiques of Gandhi, ed. Harold Coward (New York: SUNY Press, 2003), 242; his emphasis.
[4] Lipner, 244-45.